Context: The Jewish people are in serious need of a religious revival. Their fate hangs in the balance.
Last year, our navi class began to examine חזקיהו in a deeper manner. We asked if he was a good king/person, or a bad one. How does one decide such a thing?
ספר ישעיהו stresses the lack of צדק ומשפט, and how the people had a problem with hubris. A religious revival would include the restoration of צדק ומשפט and the self removal of hubris. However, when we read about the religious revival in חזקיהו's time, we do not see that. We see that he got rid of the במות so that people would go to the בית ימקדש. We said that perhaps חזקיהו has a bit of arrogance in his personality, and is a double sided personality. He has a religious side and then an everything else side, and he only goes to ישעיהו for religious help. Then later when Hashem saves them from אשור, he does not thank Hashem.
In Perek לט, we saw that after the sick king, חזקיהו , was saved by Hashem, the king of Babylonia heard that he had recovered and sent him a gift. And then חזקיהו showed them every single treasure of his house- his silver, gold, spices, oil, and treasures. That doesn't seem like something a modest guy would do. Somebody comes to give you a "yay you're alive present", and you show off how wealthy you are. It's not the best thing to do.
ישעיהו asks חזקיהו what he showed the Babylonian messengers, and he tells him that he showed them everything. Then ישעיהו tells him that Hashem said: One day all of your riches will go to Babylonia, and your sons will work in his palace. And in response חזקיהו says, "Good is what Hashem has said, because there will be peace and truth in my days." It seems that he is saying he does not care, because he'll be dead by then.
How does this relate to Chumash? This past week we said that some commandments apply to our religious life, and other commandments apply to our moral lives. You must have a mix of both religious and moral to be a good person. If you are religious you are not automatically good and G-d does not automatically love you. As we can see with Chizkiyahu, who brought about a religious revival, you can still be religious and yet not completely moral.
Some questions I would like to pose:
Do you think that it is enough to only be moral and not religious? If yes, why?
Do you think it is enough to be only religious? If yes, why? If no, why?
If you answered that it is enough to be moral but not enough to be religious: Why do you think it's okay to only be moral and forget religion when you can't have religion and forget moral? Is it because you feel that the Torah is restricting and it should be a choice- I'm interested to know what you think.
--Just another random thought that I had while writing this
Sometimes we get set on our opinions, and when people disagree we get highly offended. And yet, when we disagree with other people we can become hostile toward them and not respect that they are entitled to an opinion, and that sometimes we might A) learn from their opinion B) they might have more knowledge on the subject.
Part of being moral is to not judge, so everyone in the world should be less judgmental when it comes to others and their religious views/interpretations.
Zahava, I like what you did with the words it looks very cool. I can't say I completely followed the Chizkiyahu part of this blog but I liked the ending and the questions that you posed. I personally think you need both in order to be a good person/Jew - if you are only religious and focus on the Torah and its laws, obviously you are lacking a major part of Hashem's commandments. However if you go the other way around and only do moral laws, you are a wonderful person but not really a godo Jew. So it really comes down to what the person wants - if they do not believe in Judaism or don't really want to follow the laws, then the religious side might seem unimportant. But in order to be a good Jew as Hashem wanted it, you truly need both.
ReplyDeleteYes, I forgot to explain the point:
ReplyDeleteChizkiyahu is a good example of someone who does not have both aspects. He showed a religious side but lacked morals, and G-d punished him because of this. He led the Jews in a religious revival, but Hashem said He did not want their meaningless korbanot. He is a great example of someone who shows only one aspect and should show both
This is a very good example! Oh, Navi!
ReplyDeleteBut yes, I think this is perfectly summed up by when Hashem says "I don't want any of your meaningless korbanot"
They were giving so many korbanot and thought that they were so righteous. They thought that there was this magnificent religious revival.
And why weren't they the good people they thought they were? They were giving korbanot and they were being good people, but they were forgetting to be nice to their fellow man.
And that is something that we cannot stop emphasizing. To be a good person you HAVE to have both. They come hand in hand. Being a 'religious' person doesn't matter if you're going to be rude to people. After all, how religious could you be- it says in the Torah to be nice, you can't skip over stuff.